Law and morality
The relationship between law and morality has been hotly debated since since the resurgence of the scientific study of jurisprudence, but the issue has not yet been resolved and possibly never will be. From Austin's extreme belief that morality and law are inseparable for judicial purposes to the nearly opposing views held by every Oriental cadi that morality and law are one, every possible viewpoint has been considered. The answer to this crucial issue will rely on the ramifications of the response that is supplied. The issue is incredibly real-world in nature.
The common understanding of the relationship between law and morality is that the law exists in some way to advance morality, to protect the circumstances that make living a moral life feasible, and then to empower men to lead sober and productive lives. The normal man views justice as a rather disorganized collection of moral ideals, and law as justice systematized. According to this perspective, the positive law is seen as a set of norms that corresponds to the code of moral laws, gaining its authority from the moral laws' obligatory nature and being just or unfair depending on how closely it resembles or departs from them.
Because it is unsuitable for scientific purposes, like all other popular notions, the lawyer must give it up—at least because he is also a scientist. Since the facts contradict it. Positive laws are not based on moral principles, and there is no court of appeal from state decrees provided by common perceptions of fairness. The average person conflates morality and the law, and they both refer to the ideas of abstract justice.
When the term "legal ethics" is used, it is understood to refer to the professional honesty of judges or lawyers and has nothing to do with the potential "rightness" or "wrongness" of specific laws themselves. In the modern world, morality and law are almost universally considered to be unrelated fields. This is a result of the idea of natural law being rejected as well as the loss of any sense of "truth" regarding man. It discredits the idea of genuine human rights, renders people powerless in the face of unfair laws, and pave the way for various authoritarian ideologies. A person who is open to the truth should be able to see this clearly, but many people's brains have been accustomed to thinking in superficial ways.
