Tariffs are discriminatory and paid by consumers (you)

F5Ts...V448
3 Oct 2024
63

 

TLDR

During his first term, Donald Trump raised tariffs and renegotiated trade agreements to "protect" US industries. For a potential second term, he has proposed a universal tariff on all US imports (10%-20%) and even steeper tariffs on Chinese goods (60%). These measures could push US tariff rates to unprecedented levels, driving up consumer prices and harming American manufacturers. The policy would isolate the US from critical allies and trigger retaliatory tariffs, risking economic downturn and geopolitical fallout. Critics argue that Trump's past customers have failed to strengthen US industries, raising concerns about his new proposals.


During his first term, Donald Trump implemented an aggressive trade policy to "protect" American industries by significantly raising tariffs and reshaping international trade agreements. The centerpiece of his trade strategy was a trade war with China, where tariffs escalated on both sides, covering a wide range of products. Trump also renegotiated NAFTA into the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and exited the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) to further assert American dominance in trade. This period saw US tariff rates rise from 1.6% in 2017 to 2.6% in 2023, making them some of the highest in recent decades.
 
For his potential second term, Trump has proposed even more radical trade restrictions, including a universal tariff on all US imports ranging from 10% to 20%, a 60% tariff on Chinese goods and a reciprocal tariff policy against countries taxing US exports. If enacted, these measures could raise effective US tariff rates to historic levels, potentially quadrupling current rates and risking severe economic consequences. Economists argue that the universal tariffs would increase consumer prices across the board, with the poorest households bearing the brunt of these additional costs.
 
The proposed policies would primarily harm American consumers, who would see price spikes in essential goods like food and clothing that the US cannot produce domestically. For example, tariffs on coffee, bananas, and other agricultural products would be a heavy tax, disproportionately impacting low-income families. American manufacturers would also suffer from increased costs for intermediate goods, making US industries less competitive.
 
Additionally, universal tariffs would alienate America's closest partners and could lead to severe geopolitical fallout. Retaliatory tariffs from the EU, Canada, Mexico, and other allies would likely follow, isolating the US and reducing its influence on the global stage. Such a scenario could push traditional allies closer to China, undermining US strategic interests.
 
Proponents of these tariffs cite the supposed success of the 2018 washing machine tariffs, which temporarily increased domestic production. However, the long-term impacts were less optimistic, with prices remaining high and overall US production stagnant. Critics warn that repeating such policies on a larger scale could lead to economic stagnation and diplomatic fallout, making the US an outlier among developed nations.

 
Conclusion

Trump's proposed trade policy marks a radical escalation from his first-term approach. While his supporters believe tariffs will "protect" American jobs and industry, the reality will likely be far more complex and damaging. Universal tariffs would hurt consumers through higher prices on essential goods, reduce competitiveness for US manufacturers, and strain relations with crucial allies. The policies are fundamentally at odds with how modern high-income economies function, making the US an outlier in global trade. If implemented, these tariffs could isolate the US economically and politically, diminishing its role on the global stage and harming its long-term strategic interests.
 
Thanks for reading. Please follow my blog and write your feedback. 
 

Get fast shipping, movies & more with Amazon Prime

Start free trial

Enjoy this blog? Subscribe to Vladlau89

0 Comments