What do you think the SEC wants to do?

SEC's official response to the scandal:
"The identity of the individual responsible for the share is still unknown.
However, it is stated that the SEC did not have access to its system and other accounts." Thanks a lot for this crucial update.
It is really difficult to understand the SEC chairman's comments and point of view. He does not take any responsibility. The SEC, which cannot protect itself against cyber attacks, appears as an authority that will decide on cryptos. They seem incapable of protecting themselves against hacker attacks. I think there is a contradiction in this regard. It would be more useful for them to educate themselves on the process of crypto, before indicating that they should be the authority.
If the SEC actually took the time to really learn the ins and outs of crypto they would be turned on their heads about how little they really know.
It sounds like a joke!