Since much of the migration is illegal - make it legal Kamala Harris

Linda Chavez argues that Kamala Harris has been unfairly labeled as the "border czar" by Republicans, misrepresenting her role and the situation at the border. Harris's task has been diplomatic, addressing migration's root causes in Central America. Despite high numbers of border encounters, many are repeat attempts, and the overall undocumented population has remained stable. Chavez criticizes temporary measures by the Biden administration and suggests Harris should promote comprehensive immigration reform, highlighting immigrants' economic benefits and creating more legal channels for work visas to counteract anti-immigrant rhetoric and push for humane solutions.
 
Linda Chavez argues that Kamala Harris has been unfairly labeled as President Joe Biden's "border czar" by Republicans, a characterization that exaggerates her role and misrepresents the situation at the border. Chavez points out that Harris's responsibility has been diplomatic, focusing on addressing the root causes of migration from Central America. One of the key initiatives in this regard is the Root Causes Strategy, which aims to create stability and opportunity in countries like Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras. By reducing the pressure on their citizens to migrate, this strategy could potentially lead to a decrease in the number of border encounters.

Chavez criticizes the portrayal of the border situation by Republicans and media, noting that while Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) encountered 2.4 million undocumented immigrants in 2023, this figure includes apprehensions and voluntary presentations for asylum, not just successful entries. Furthermore, many of these encounters are repeat attempts by individuals who had been previously removed. Despite the large numbers, the overall undocumented population in the U.S. has remained stable at around 11.2 million.

The Biden administration's response has been mixed, with some practical measures like using an app for asylum appointments and granting humanitarian parole to those fleeing persecution from specific countries. However, other measures, such as reinstating expedited removals without court hearings, are seen as temporary fixes rather than sustainable solutions.

Chavez emphasizes the need for Harris to articulate a comprehensive immigration reform agenda. This agenda should provide long-term solutions rather than temporary measures. She suggests that Harris should promote the benefits of immigration, including the economic contributions of immigrants, and create more legal channels for immigration and work visas. By doing so, Harris can counteract anti-immigrant rhetoric and push for humane and rational immigration reforms that effectively address the border situation.
 
Thanks for reading. Please follow my blog and write your feedback.