Craig Wright: Adam Buck of Legal Collision Reveals Satoshi Nakamoto's Correspondence| NEXTMONEY｜Virt

Unpublished emails of Satoshi Nakamoto and key early witnesses in COPA and Craig Wright's lawsuit will be released; witnesses will testify about their correspondence with Mr. Nakamoto, and emails with Mr. Buck will also be examined.
image
Newly released unpublished emails with Satoshi NakamotoIn the ongoing litigation between the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) and Craig Wright, three key witnesses who had early interactions with Bitcoin (Bitcoin/BTC) founder Satoshi Nakamoto have testified and newly released undisclosed emails from the early days of the case have been released.*For more information about COPA, click here.In the first email, sent approximately four months before Bitcoin was officially announced, Blockstream CEO Adam Back discusses the flagship virtual currency with Mr. Nakamoto, and this email was sent from Satoshi Nakamoto to Mr. Back.Witnesses challenge Craig Wright in court.
Adam Buck was one of the first to testify, and at the request of Bird & Bird's legal team, he released a series of emails with Nakamoto.One of the emails from Mr. Nakamoto emphasizes his intent to cite Buck's contributions to the Bitcoin White Paper, particularly the PoW concept derived from the Hashcash mechanism, and this citation is made in the original 2008 Bitcoin White Paper.In an email exchange, Buck noted the similarities between Nakamoto's concept and Wei Dai's B-Money; Nakamoto agreed with this view and chose to include a reference to Dai in his white paper; Buck contributed to the exchange by sharing a document titled "micromint" with Nakamoto, but was not contacted by the bitcoin creator thereafter until the bitcoin software was released.
Martti Malmi (Martti Malmi) was initially hesitant to participate but offered his own insights; Malmi recalled his early interactions with Nakamoto and mentioned his awareness of Craig Wright in 2015, criticizing Wright's complex article as "very long, difficult to follow, difficult to understand" He was puzzled why Wright did not choose the simpler proof of signing the message; Malmi said he was not sure why Wright would have chosen the more simple proof of signing the message, but he was sure that Wright's message would have been more difficult to understandThe Finnish computer scientist also noted Wright's many legal objections and unexpected statements in court, where Marmi said he was inaccurately told by Wright that he was Norwegian, even though he was clearly aware of Nakamoto's Finnish origin.
#BITCOIN #NFT