The emergence of cryptocurrencies and crypto assets has created a need for new valuation frameworks. As this new asset class has grown, investors and analysts have developed different models to value crypto protocols and blockchain networks. Unlike traditional company valuation using P/E ratios or DCF analysis, crypto projects are decentralized networks built on token economics. This requires more creative valuation approaches.

Market Value of Crypto Assets

The most straightforward way to value a crypto asset is by looking at its market capitalization. This is calculated by multiplying the circulating token supply by the current market price of the token. For example, if a project has 100 million tokens in circulation and each token trades at $1, the network's market capitalization is $100 million.

While easy to calculate, a project's market cap doesn't reflect its fair fundamental value. Crypto markets are highly speculative and prices can be moved by hype, momentum and speculation. Market caps offer a snapshot of what the crowd thinks but should be viewed as a starting point rather than a conclusive fair valuation.

Discounted Cash Flow Models

A discounted cash flow (DCF) model takes estimated future cash flows from a business, discounts them to today's value, and sums them to determine current fair value. DCF is commonly used in stock valuation but can be applied to crypto networks as well.

The first step is projecting the future cash flows the crypto asset is expected to produce. This might include transaction fees, block rewards, network fees, or other revenue streams. Next, a discount rate is applied to factor in risk. The higher the risk, the higher the rate to discount future cash flows. The discounted cash flows are then added up to find the net present value - the fair value today.

Challenges exist in projecting the future cash flows of crypto networks accurately. But DCF valuation provides a more fundamental approach versus just looking at market cap.

Crypto Asset Rating Models

Rating models analyze and score different key aspects of a crypto project based on criteria like the team, vision, code, community, and market traction. Each category gets a rating, which are combined into an overall project rating.

Examples of crypto rating frameworks include Outlier Ventures' Cryptoasset Scorecard and Aragon Network Token's value drivers model. Rating models allow for more qualitative analysis alongside quantitative metrics. The resulting rating aims to gauge the overall project quality, viability, and progress.

Network Value to Transactions Ratio

The network value to transactions (NVT) ratio has been called "the PE ratio for cryptoassets." The NVT ratio equals network value (market cap) divided by daily transaction volume on the blockchain. The lower the ratio, the cheaper the token price relative to network usage and transaction value flowing through the chain.

Some limitations exist in using NVT ratios for valuation. Transaction count can be manipulated, and assets with low velocity like Bitcoin can appear overvalued due to low transaction volumes. However, NVT serves as a useful data point for comparing blockchain activity and usage across different crypto networks.

Equation of Exchange Model

The equation of exchange (MV = PQ) is a formula used in monetary economics to understand the relationship between money supply, velocity, price level, and economic output. In crypto, this expands to:

Market Cap = Price X Transaction Volume

Rearranged, this formula states that price can be derived from market cap divided by transaction volume. This allows estimating a fundamental value based on the crypto asset's underlying usage and economic flows.

While no valuation approach is perfect, the equation of exchange provides a model for estimating fair value grounded in real network activity rather than hype or speculation.

Token Velocity Valuation

Token velocity measures how frequently units of a cryptocurrency are exchanged in a given time period. It reflects user adoption, circulation speed, and usage frequency of a cryptoasset.

By incorporating velocity, we can value a crypto network based on Total Transaction Volume / Token Velocity = Network Value. For assets with high velocity like payment tokens, increases in transaction volume and velocity can justify higher network values even at lower token prices.

However, velocity can change over time so static assumptions may lead to inaccurate valuations. Analysts have to use careful estimates of future velocity based on use cases, tokenomics, and other utility drivers.

Comparables Analysis Valuation

Another common technique is using comparables analysis to value crypto projects based on similar networks and assets. The most relevant valuation multiples to use as comparables include:

• Price/Sales Ratio
• Enterprise Value/Revenue
• Enterprise Value/EBITDA
• P/E Ratios

Once similar crypto assets are identified, an average of their valuation multiples can be calculated, and applied to the financial metrics of the crypto project being valued to estimate a potential valuation range. The challenge is finding applicable comparable networks, especially for early stage projects.

Cost of Production Valuation

For cryptoassets like Bitcoin and commodities like gold, some analysts value these assets based on their cost of production. Mining crypto tokens requires intensive computational work and energy. Thus, some value crypto assets by calculating the estimated costs involved in mining new supply.

However, critics argue that cost of production does not directly determine fair value. The market ultimately determines prices based on broader supply and demand dynamics beyond just mining costs. Still, production costs may provide a useful data point in valuing certain crypto commodity assets.

Unconventional Valuation Metrics

As crypto evolves, new valuation approaches and unconventional metrics are emerging such as:

• Lindy Effect - The theory that future life expectancy can be gauged by current age, suggesting that the longer something has survived, the more likely it will continue surviving.
• Nakamoto Coefficient - Measures decentralization based on the number of entities needed to collude to compromise a network. Highly decentralized networks are valued more.
• Developer Activity - Code commits, GitHub activity, and developer growth may hint at a project's potential and warrant a higher valuation.
• Social Volume - Tracking social media and community discussions about a crypto project to gauge sentiment and engagement.

While these reflect interesting perspectives, they lack a clear direct correlation to fair valuation and remain highly speculative metrics. Nonetheless, as the crypto space matures, new valuation ideas continue to emerge.

Valuing Cryptocurrencies vs. Crypto Networks

Importantly, the valuation approaches above are more applicable to crypto networks and their underlying tokens rather than to exchange traded cryptocurrency coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Cryptocurrencies tend to behave like commodities and are valued based on supply, demand, scarcity, liquidity and other monetary attributes.

Crypto networks and their tokens derive value from the decentralized applications, platforms, and services offered. This may enable more revenue-based valuation approaches. However, both cryptos and crypto networks remain early, evolving technologies, making valuation a constant learning process.

Challenges in Crypto Valuation

While traditional valuation frameworks can be applied, estimating the intrinsic value of decentralized, open-source crypto networks presents unique challenges:

• Extreme Volatility - Crypto markets see wild price swings driven by speculation that distort prices and valuations.
• Early Stage Assets - Most crypto projects are new and risky technologies, making estimating future cash flows near impossible.
• Lack of Fundamentals - These networks do not have traditional fundamentals like P/E ratios to base valuations on. New models using different data are required.
• Intangible Value Drivers - Crypto projects gain value from community engagement, security, decentralization and other intangibles that are hard to quantify.
• Rapid Innovation - New projects and use cases launch constantly, as crypto networks iterate and build quickly. Valuations become outdated fast.
• Fragmented Data - There is no uniform structured source for the financial metrics and blockchain data required for crypto analysis and valuations.
• Manipulated Data - Cryptocurrencies often see fake trading volume, transactions, and inflated activity designed to mislead investors.
• Speculative Manias - Irrational exuberance and crowd psychology can override any attempt at fundamental modeling or valuation.

These challenges make crypto analysis as much an art as a science. No valuation model will be perfect or have an advantage for long in these constantly evolving markets.

Despite the challenges, developing effective valuation models remains crucial for understanding this new digital asset class. Valuation drives investment decisions and allows comparing crypto projects against one another. Crypto analysts continue innovating new models and combining different approaches for better insights.

Thank you for reading, and I hope you've enjoyed this article and gained some knowledge.

Your Support Matters:

ICP : wbak4-ujyhn-jtb4f-gyddm-jkpwu-viujq-7jwe3-wl3ck-azbpz-gy45g-tqe

SOLANA : 5tGG8ausWWo8u9K1brb2tZQEKuDMZ9C6kUD1e96dkNBo

ETHEREUM/polygon/OP/ARB/FTM/ AVAX/BNB : 0x608E4C17B3f891cAca5496f97c63b55AD2240BB5

BITCOIN : bc1qehnkue20nce3zgec73qvmhy0g3zak69l24y06g