There is no "free" solar energy

TLDR:
Solar energy has become incredibly cheap, making headlines about "free" solar power. However, this overlooks a critical issue: solar energy is only cheap when the sun is shining. To make solar the backbone of an energy grid, expensive storage solutions like batteries or hydrogen are necessary, which don't yet scale efficiently. As a result, a 100% solar grid would be highly costly despite the cheap generation. Solar energy's unpredictability creates problems for the grid, leading to higher costs and market imbalances. Solar remains cheap and expensive until storage technologies improve, complicating its role in a sustainable energy future.

Solar energy has rapidly become one of the cheapest power sources, with headlines declaring that we are entering an era of "basically free" solar electricity. The cost of photovoltaic (PV) panels has dropped significantly, making solar energy cheaper than coal-fired power. However, this narrative only tells part of the story. While solar generation costs have decreased, critical issues still prevent solar from being a standalone solution for modern energy grids.
 
The main challenge with solar energy is that it's only available when the sun is shining, and electricity demand doesn't always align with sunlight. Solar power requires backup systems, most commonly energy storage, to ensure a reliable supply when sunlight is unavailable. Storage solutions—whether batteries, hydrogen, or pumped hydro—are currently costly and don't scale well enough to meet the needs of an entirely solar-powered grid. This is where the idea of "basically free" solar becomes misleading: while generating solar power is cheap, storing and distributing it is costly and complicated.
 
To make solar energy viable on a large scale, energy grids would need massive investments in storage infrastructure. For example, storing electricity in batteries costs much more than generating it in a nuclear power plant. This cost discrepancy makes the idea of a 100% solar grid financially unfeasible with today's technology. Countries that have tried to implement solar at a grid-scale, especially without massive subsidies, have faced significant hurdles. For instance, many developing countries, lacking the financial backing of wealthy nations, have struggled to adopt solar energy on a large scale due to the high costs associated with storage.
 
The unpredictability of solar power also disrupts energy markets. When solar energy floods the grid with low demand, it can lead to negative pricing—where grid operators must pay to eliminate excess power. This phenomenon has led to "curtailment," where solar systems are turned off to prevent grid overload. In addition, grid operators must invest in expensive systems to manage these fluctuations, raising costs for consumers who still rely on traditional power sources.

While advances in battery technology may eventually solve some of these problems, they haven't yet reached the scale needed to make solar a stable and cost-effective grid backbone. Solar energy is a source of cheap and costly electricity, depending on when and how it's used.
 
Concluding Remarks:
The promise of solar energy is undeniable, but the realities of storage and grid management reveal a more complex picture. While solar power generation is now cheaper than ever, its reliance on costly storage technologies undermines its potential as a singular solution to global energy needs. The gap between generation and storage capabilities means solar is still the complete answer to our energy challenges. Moving forward, investment in storage technologies will be crucial. Only with such breakthroughs can solar live up to its potential as a dominant force in global energy markets, balancing affordability and reliability.
 
Thanks for reading. Please follow my blog and write your feedback.