Misusing federalism against democracy and human rights

 
TLDR
Federalism is often seen as a protector of minority rights and human rights by enabling regional autonomy and power-sharing. However, its effectiveness varies depending on context. For geographically dispersed minorities, federalism may not provide sufficient protection, and it can marginalize groups like Indigenous peoples. Federal units can also abuse their autonomy, as seen in historical and modern U.S. cases. Additionally, federalism can fuel conflicts, such as the U.S. Civil War and Quebec's near-secession in 1995. While federalism has potential benefits, it also presents significant challenges that must be carefully managed to protect all citizens.

In his recent article via Open Global Rights, academic Raymond A. Smith writes about what problems and misusage of federalism have been done in history and what risks can be done in the future.

Federalism is often heralded as a system that supports human rights and protects minority groups by enabling regional autonomy and promoting power-sharing across different levels of government. However, this idealized view does not always hold up in practice. The effectiveness of federalism in protecting minority rights depends heavily on the specific context in which it is implemented, and several pitfalls can undermine its benefits.

One major challenge is that federalism works best when minority groups are geographically concentrated, as seen in Quebec, Canada, where the Francophone population benefits from regional autonomy within a federal structure. However, for dispersed minorities, such as certain ethnic or racial communities in the U.S. and Canada, federalism may not provide sufficient protection. These groups often rely on national governments to uphold their rights, as local governments may not prioritize their interests.

Moreover, federalism can sometimes exclude or marginalize certain groups entirely. In the U.S., Native American nations have a unique status that does not fully integrate them into the federal system. While they are recognized as sovereign entities, they remain subject to federal laws and regulations that many argue are discriminatory. This creates a situation where Indigenous peoples do not have the same representation or rights as other citizens within the federal system.

Another significant issue is the potential for federal units to abuse their autonomy. In the U.S., the concept of "States' Rights" has historically been used to justify discriminatory practices, such as racial segregation in the South. Even today, some states enact laws targeting marginalized groups, and the federal government may struggle to intervene effectively due to political and constitutional constraints.

Finally, while federalism can prevent separatist movements by accommodating regional differences, it can also fuel conflict. The U.S. Civil War is a historical example of how strong state governments can lead to devastating conflict. Similarly, the 1995 Quebec independence referendum nearly led to the secession of the province from Canada, highlighting the tensions that federalism can create.

While federalism has the potential to protect minority rights and promote human rights, it also has significant limitations and risks. Supporters of federal democracy must carefully consider these challenges and work to ensure that federalism is implemented in a way that truly protects all citizens.

Thanks for reading. Please follow my blog and write your feedback.